An acquaintance of mine had a tip for my photoblog this week: "have a weekly theme." So yesterday, being the start of my week, was a picture of a very angry robin. I thought I would go with wildlife photographs--which can be difficult. In order to get a good picture, you need to have decent light, and get close enough to to the subject so you don't have to crop the heck out of it. I did manage to take a picture, you can find it here. I had to crop quite a bit on this picture. Light wasn't ideal, so there wasn't a lot of dynamic of light. I had to use Lightroom to enhance the ducks head, to get more color out of it. Not to mention, that I've got a water grey background and nothing really interesting in the picture besides the boring duck. Short story: I thought the picture stunk. I'm still going to try for wildlife photographs for the remainder of this week--just I couldn't use it as todays.
This leads me back to my photograph. As I was driving down to the lake, I drove past this and I thought that it was interesting. Perhaps it is because I have a certain affinity to trees that are canopied over the road. It just makes me think not in the city sort of feeling. I still had the same problems with lighting, however. An overcast day does not leave you a lot to work with, (which isn't to say that light at noon leaves you much either.) So what to do in this situation? I cheated. I liked the image that was in my head, so I bracketed my photo, taking 3 shots quickly with a 2 stop exposure value difference (0, +2, -2). I then dumped them into Nik Softwares HDR (High Dynamic Range) program, fiddled with it a bit, and then cranked this image out. I liked how it looked for screen. If I were to print this on large format, I would definitely have to fix some of the issues there are (purple lines around the trees where it merges, etc.)
I was reluctant to put this up, for todays photograph mostly because I feel like shooting images for HDR isn't as helpful for my photography skills. It is sort of cheating. You usually cannot get this level of detail from a regular photograph taken digitally. (Shooting 4x5" format, you might.) I used three photographs, that by themselves, didn't do much for me. But when combining them into one photograph--it was pretty good. Still, I'm going to try to not shoot for HDR unless I absolutely need to.
Exposure Information:
1/30, 1/125, 1/500 sec, ISO 100. f/9.0, 11mm.
No original, as this was a HDR shot.
No original, as this was a HDR shot.

Alright, first off, I tried posting on a few of your pictures earlier and blogspot wasn't letting me type in the NonBot confirmation word fields. So I gave up. Anyway...
ReplyDeleteI was going to suggest a while ago to have a theme for a certain number of days. Maybe not a whole week but like 3 or 5 at a time. My first suggestion was going to be unusual or unplanned geometric shapes in nature/culture.
Also, I really enjoyed that duck picture but probably not for the reasons you're focusing on. I know you were upset about the dull colors but what I see in that picture is a beautiful natural animal sitting on dirty concrete in front of grey water which speaks to a saddening message of humanity encroaching on natural boundaries. But that's just one critics' (bored guy's) opinion.